The Whaling ban is only a gentleman's agreement.
|Photo: John Brookland/animalrightsandwrongsuk|
On the 1st. July, 2019 Japan announced it was beginning commercial whaling again causing worldwide outrage and accusations of illegality. But tragically they had every right to do so as they had formally withdrawn from the international agreement not to hunt. The so called moratorium was only ever a gentleman's agreement and a trade bargain. In June 2020 the whaling fleet returned from its first hunt with the frozen meat of 237 whales and plans to increase hunting in the future.
Agreement only intended to preserve stock for future hunting
Most large species of whale were nearly hunted to extinction during the first half of the 20th. Century which resulted in 1946 with the signing of the Convention for the Regulation of Whaling by the major whaling nations, not for the rights of the whales but to "provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry". Whaling has continued since the ban under a quota system "confined to those species best able to sustain exploitation to give an interval for recovery". Their ideal has always been to properly regulate whale stocks to maintain enough to capture without endangering them as a natural resource.
The International Whaling Commission (IWC) was set up under the Convention and the members meet every two years to decide which species can be hunted, how many and by who and various other policy issues. Any country can join regardless of whether they want to hunt whales or not and each member has voting rights.
This system did not work very well and countries continued to whale pretty much unhindered which resulted in organisations like Greenpeace literally putting themselves between the whales and whaling ships while hundreds of campaigners devoted years during the 1970's and early 80's attempting to bring whaling to a complete halt by lobbying and pressuring various countries to vote for a total halt on commercial whaling.
This was extremely difficult because the whaling nations were not agreeable to interference in their traditional and lucrative industry, but finally a vote taken in 1986 placed a moratorium on commercial whaling of vulnerable species like Humpback, but still allowed hunting of smaller species. Iceland and Norway objected to the moratorium and Norway withdrew in 1993, while Japan and Iceland continue hunting whales under the guise of "scientific research", and many nations still try to over turn the ban.
|Photo: John Brookland/animalrightsandwrongs.uk|
The ban was greeted as a great victory by campaigners which it was, as instead of tens of thousands being killed each year the number is now a few thousand per year. Unfortunately the moratorium was never a complete ban as hidden in the Convention is a "get out" clause which states that any country could begin commercial whaling by just withdrawing from the IWC Convention. And this is exactly what Japan did.
Any member country of the Convention can just opt out
Article XI of the Convention allows any member Government to withdraw from the agreement on the 30th. June of any year by giving notice before the 1st. January of the same year. Although not morally responsible it is legal. There was a worry that other countries would follow Japan's lead and pull out, but this does not appear to be happening.
Astrid Fuchs of Whale and Dolphin Conservation (WDC) stated that Japan's action may "encourage other countries to quit IWC". There were rumours that South Korea had an increasing taste for whale meat and officials were worried they will soon follow.
Many countries claim an exemption and receive a quota for their "aboriginal" inhabitants to hunt small numbers of small whales for their own needs, but many of these now want to increase their hunting to sell the by-products. Countries which presently hunt whales in one form or another are Japan, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, Russia, USA, St. Vincent and Grenadines, South Korea and Greenland.
Japan has never agreed with the moratorium
Why has Japan done it? Well they have tried every trick in the book to continue whaling since the moratorium came into force including using the loophole all countries have of catching whales for "scientific purposes". Japan has also allegedly been catching more than its allowed quota of Minke whales for years and trying to persuade member countries to support a vote on their proposal of "small type commercial whaling" (STCW) using small whaling ships in territorial waters.
At one point they were involved in a scandal when they were accused of allegedly bribing countries (mainly African and other poor countries none of which whale hunt) with aid and resources if they joined the IWC and voted with them to overturn the ban on commercial whaling permanently. They almost succeeded in doing so. The decision to leave the IWC wass no doubt a result of their frustration at all their efforts being thwarted.
I have been lucky enough to have had many close encounters with whales in many parts of the world and they truly justify being described by the overused term awesome. If you have never been whale watching make it the top of your bucket list and I defy anyone not to be emotionally affected by the experience. We need these unassuming, helpless and magnificent creatures in our world and they still need our support.
Organisations which campaign against whaling and try to protect whales include:
Whale and Dolphin Conservation
Post a Comment
This site welcomes constructive input and points of view.